This startup founded by former Google and Leica engineers that creates maps for autonomous cars just raised $25 M
DeepMap is the latest in the list of startups that are focussed on mapping and localization for autonomous vehicles. The 25-person startup based in Palo Alto that was in stealth mode for the last year announced a $25 million Series A funding round lead by Accel. (Read: Introducing DeepMap).
DeepMap announced their funding round only a few days ago and have already made the deadlines on several different tech blogs including VentureBeat and even Bloomberg news! Quite the entry!
DeepMap – A startup with a strong mapping background
Both the founders (James Wu and Mark Wheeler) of DeepMap have strong mapping backgrounds. James was involved with Google Earth, helped with the launch of Apple Maps. Mark has a Ph.D. from Carnegie Mellon University on “Automatic object modeling and localization of 3D objects in 3D and 2D imagery”, worked at Apple and Leica Geosystems on LiDAR technology.
DeepMap Team and their background
What are they working on?
DeepMap’s primary product is a “full-stack service that optimizes the entire process from map creation, to map consumption and map serving”. In essence, they are tackling the three most important challenges facing mapping for autonomous cars today i.e.
- Creating really accurate HD maps,
- Ensuring that autonomous cars can localize themselves in 3D space
- Making sure all the V2V communication and HD map updates can be handled in a cost effective manner
Is DeepMap a competition for Google, HERE, and TomTom?
Creating maps for machines is a relatively new field with not too players with expertise. Nevertheless, DeepMap is on taking on the likes of Google, TomTom and HERE with their HD mapping capabilities, not to forget other startups like Civil Maps.
Not much is known about DeepMap besides their Series A funding, so it might be too early to judge. That being said, of course, their investors think they have the potential to take on the likes of TomTom and HERE. If they can come up with a solution that is cost effective and scalable, then nothing is impossible!
The future is already here, it’s just not evenly distributed. So stay tuned. We’ll hear about DeepMap soon.
#Business
Next article
When Apple launched its Maps back in 2012, it was a total failure (at least from a user perspective). The company stitched together spatial data from multiple vendors, and the overall effect was much below user expectations. It showed that making maps is much more difficult than, one might imagine.
Most of the navigation layers in Apple Maps are based on TomTom’s data and OSM in countries where TomTom doesn’t have decent coverage. Additionally, the company uses multiple local data providers like Waze for Israel, or AND for some areas in Eastern Europe
(a full list of data sources that Apple uses is available on the official acknowledgments page).
Everyone in the industry thought that the only way forward was a big acquisition of one of the global independent mapping data providers: TomTom or HERE. Investment from Apple would allow them to fill in coverage gaps in less developed countries. But Apple decided to go its own way, why is that?
First of all, Apple doesn’t like to take over big organizations. It prefers talent acquisitions of small engineering teams or innovative ideas and visions (here is the full list of geospatial startups Apple acquired). It is related to the company’s culture that brings together the brightest minds and has full control over who it takes on board.
But there is also a much more serious reason. Navteq – the mapping company acquired by Nokia in 2008 and rebranded to HERE, had been founded in 1985. The origins of TeleAtlas – which is the company behind TomTom maps, goes back to 1984. These two companies have over 30 years experience in the industry which is a great asset, but also many of their processes remember the beginning of the last decade (if not 90s), which on the other side is a huge burden.
Apple likes to have things polished not only from the outside but also from the inside. When you buy a small startup, it is easy to clean up and reuse the code they’ve created. When you buy a 30 years old tech company that hires several thousand people, it is much more difficult.
In that sort of companies, although they create amazing things, there are always some old databases and processes that someone developed as a workaround, and since it works, no one touches it. There is always someone whose job for the past 20 years was to copy things from one system to another because it’s cheaper to keep it that way than to integrate it. In that sense, I totally get Apple. Creating the process from scratch and designing it well (without workarounds) might be easier than to improve the existing one.
Making and keeping maps up-to-date is a very costly, complex and labor-intensive process. TomTom and HERE know about it. Apple was certainly looking into disrupting the industry by applying latest technologies to map making process. But there is no disruption technology on the market yet.
All three major global data providers Google, TomTom and HERE have a similar process to keep maps updated. They have local employees, community or users who (actively or passively) report the changes to the road network or geography. For each case, they need to find data source, and at the end, someone in the data production center in India is applying the update to the database.
Apple tried a different approach, but at the end of the day, the company started to work in a similar model. Apple hires local teams around the world, it started to operate a fleet of mapping cars (the same as Google, TomTom and HERE to gather data in the field), and finally, it opened a map data production center in Hyderabad, India with 4000 vacancies to be covered.
There are a couple of things that we’ve learned from Apple Maps case. First of all, there are no shortcuts when it comes to making navigation-quality maps. Apple figured it out quite quickly after the initial problems, and today after 5 years their Maps are already usable. Secondly, it shows that the location context is so important that companies can invest billions of dollars to have it. Finally, this not another temporal trend or fashion. When a company like Apple hires several thousand people to make it happen, it’s definitely a long-term commitment.
