Your trusty old TomTom sat-nav device may be at the risk of becoming obsolete and not being able to renew any maps or services. Not possible, you say? You have support for ‘lifetime updates’, you say? Well, turns out, the Dutch mapping company has a new definition of what it calls a lifetime.
According to TomTom, “Lifetime means the useful life of the device, i.e. the period of time TomTom supports your device with updates, services, content or accessories. A device will have reached the end of its life when none of these are available anymore.”
The mapmaker has compiled a list of sat-nav products it is convinced do not have sufficient resources to run the newest maps and software available with TomTom. Check out the whole list below:
What does it mean for me?
If you own any of the above-listed TomTom sat-nav devices, say goodbye to software updates – you will not be receiving any. You will not be able to renew any maps or services either. But if you have an active subscription running, you will keep getting map updates till the time that subscription expires. Over time, as the maps get outdated, you can expect your navigation routes to become less and less accurate.
TomTom is trying to use this opportunity as a marketing pitch for its newer products, urging users to buy new hardware. “This may be the perfect opportunity to discover what our new range of navigation products has to offer you,” the company says.
This cheeky move that has not gone down well with the user community despite the company offering new products at discounted rates to existing patrons. And angry users have taken to Twitter to express their dislike:
#tomtom So “lifetime” doesn’t mean “lifetime”? Nothing like ripping off the customer. Wont be getting another tomtom satnav. Will be advising all friends and family to steer clear as well.
— Iain Moore (@mooreiain) January 30, 2018
I am disgusted that @UKTomTom are no longer providing updates for a range of satnavs bought in good faith. Had mine for Xmas 2016 and now I read on the news that its useless?! I will be looking into a class action for breach of statutory rights. ‘lifetime’ means lifetime. #tomtom
— m@ ?️? (@Matts_Tweeting) January 29, 2018
@TomTom Less than 4 yrs ago I purchased a Start 25 with free lifetime maps to 2024. I now read that you have withdrawn the service! Very unhappy! Won’t be buying TomTom again! #Con #MissSold #AvoidTomTom
— Les Clarke (@wardaler) January 29, 2018
Do you own any of the products TomTom plans to withdraw support from? Would you be buying a new TomTom product to ensure uninterrupted service? Let us know in comments below!
Did you like this post? Read more and subscribe to our monthly newsletter!
#Business
Next article
In June 2014, Strava, which offers cycling and running tracking apps for multiple fitness platforms, claimed to be tracking over 1 million activities per week across the globe. In the next couple of years, the GPS tracking startup managed to capture 1 billion activities, 3 trillion lat-long points, and 5% of all land on Earth covered by tiles. Strava naturally wanted to showcase the reach of its huge user community. And that it did by populating its interactive global heat map with a total recorded activity duration of 200,000 years — a sample of which you can see below:
But the activity, which was only meant to visualize Strava’s global network of athletes, turned into a headache for security agencies around the world last weekend when a sharp-eyed Twitter user pointed out that the map gave out locations and activities of soldiers at military bases throughout the world.
Strava released their global heatmap. 13 trillion GPS points from their users (turning off data sharing is an option). https://t.co/hA6jcxfBQI … It looks very pretty, but not amazing for Op-Sec. US Bases are clearly identifiable and mappable pic.twitter.com/rBgGnOzasq
— Nathan Ruser (@Nrg8000) January 27, 2018
To be clear, the map, which was published online in November 2017, doesn’t give out any live data. While a total of 3 trillion GPS points had been uploaded to Strava till September 2017, the global heat map only shows the aggregate of all publically-shared logs for running speeds that are not higher than reasonable (bike rides, cars, and planes are filtered out).
If a soldier wanted to keep his/her activities private, Strava provides an enhanced privacy mode for that. The tracker also has options that let people hide the places where they live or work; a user can set up a privacy zone between 200m-1km around chosen addresses.
With a single click, users can also opt-out of contributing anonymized public activity data that the heat map is made up of — though that single click would need to be made on the Web version of the service because the privacy controls on the mobile app are not all-inclusive. But the thing is, that option is not checked by default, and most people don’t seem to be aware of the privacy options available to them, either on the Web or on the mobile.
Related: Strava’s visualization maps speed of thousands rides and runs
The result is that the fitness routes of soldiers in sensitive locations are now discoverable with a few zoom-ins. Even secret military bases and installations in combat zones can be picked out from this data.
This is because while the map is lit up with activity in the United States and Europe, forward operating bases stand out as isolated hotspots in countries like Afghanistan, Syria, and Yemen, where the fitness tracker does not have too many users.
If soldiers use the app like normal people do, by turning it on tracking when they go to do exercise, it could be especially dangerous. This particular track looks like it logs a regular jogging route. I shouldn’t be able to establish any Pattern of life info from this far away pic.twitter.com/Rf5mpAKme2
— Nathan Ruser (@Nrg8000) January 27, 2018
As this discovery became viral, US Army’s Central Command press office in Kuwait released a statement to the Washington Post, detailing how the military is refining the privacy rules that apply to fitness trackers and pushing for enforcement of the current regulations governing such devices.
“The rapid development of new and innovative information technologies enhances the quality of our lives but also poses potential challenges to operational security and force protection,” the statement said. “The Coalition is in the process of implementing refined guidance on privacy settings for wireless technologies and applications, and such technologies are forbidden at certain Coalition sites and during certain activities.”
While we are all for open data and its numerous valuable implications, this incident is just a reminder that users need to be mindful of what kind of information they are sharing with the world.
