#Agriculture #Data processing #Drones #Drones #Environment #Environmental Protection #Featured #Geospatial analytics #Geospatial for Good #Humanitarian #Science #Vegetation Management

How Drone Data Helps to Monitor and Reverse Deforestation While Empowering Local Communities

Editor’s note: This article was written as part of EO Hub – a journalistic collaboration between UP42 and Geoawesome. Created for policymakers, decision-makers, geospatial experts and enthusiasts alike, EO Hub is a key resource for anyone trying to understand how Earth observation is transforming our world. Read more about EO Hub here


Earth lost nearly a football pitch of carbon-absorbing rainforest every 5 seconds in 2022, according to the World Resources Institute (WRI). Deforestation has most acutely affected tropical rainforests, with 9.3 million hectares lost each year between 2015 and 2020—mostly due to human activities like agriculture, logging, and mining.

These alarming annual deforestation rates have severe impacts on biodiversity, greenhouse gas emissions, and local communities. It strips the livelihoods of many forest-dependent communities that rely on forests for shelter, income, and food. 

How can technology support those impacted? 

In this article, we’ll look at traditional and modern methods of monitoring deforestation, and how these can be utilized to reverse it and empower local communities in the process. Drones, specifically, have the potential to keep a close eye on forests, deforestation, and conservation efforts.

Why does deforestation happen?

Deforestation, the large-scale removal of forest areas, stands as one of the most pressing environmental challenges of our time. 

Since 1990, over 420 million hectares of forest have been lost due to human activities. The devastating scale of deforestation is hard to comprehend. Approximately 2,400 trees are cut down each minute. Such a rapid rate of loss means that by 2030, there may be only 10% of the world’s rainforests left.

It sounds bleak and it is. As a society, we grapple with the balance between growth and sustainability. 

So, why does deforestation happen? Where will we go from here?

Deforestation is primarily driven by activities that prioritize short-term economic gains over long-term ecological sustainability. At the forefront of these drivers is agricultural expansion, with vast tracts of forest being cleared to make way for cattle ranches and crop fields. This is in response to the ever-growing global demand for food and livestock products. 

Alongside agriculture, the timber industry continues to exert significant pressure on forests worldwide. While not the primary cause, logging for timber and paper products still contributes to forest loss, with illegal logging a significant issue in areas of the Amazon, Central America, and Southeast Asia. 

Wildfires, both natural and human-caused, can result in significant forest loss. 75% of tropical rainforests have lost the ability to properly recover from wildfires and drought.

Urbanization also plays a large role, as cities expand outward, encroaching upon forests to accommodate growing populations and infrastructure needs. The construction of roads, dams, and mines, as well as this urban expansion, contribute to around 15% of deforestation. 

With urbanization expected to increase, how can we better protect our forests? 

This complex interplay of economic, social, and demographic factors has resulted in a relentless assault on the world’s forests, threatening biodiversity, disrupting climate patterns, and jeopardizing the livelihoods of communities that depend on these ecosystems.

Grim findings from recent research indicate that the Amazon rainforest has now shifted from being a carbon sink to a net carbon source. This means it emits more carbon dioxide than it absorbs, releasing approximately 1 billion tonnes of CO2 per year. 

This critical tipping point is a wake-up call for us all. It indicates the urgent need to reduce global emissions and protect the remaining forests.

What are the impacts of deforestation?

Deforestation has multifaceted impacts on the environment, biodiversity, climate, and society as a whole. Addressing these requires a combination of policy measures, sustainable practices, reforestation efforts, and community engagement:

  1. Loss of biodiversity: Forests are home to a vast array of plant and animal species. Deforestation destroys habitats and pushes many species towards extinction. 70% of the planet’s land animals and plants live in forests, and many cannot survive deforestation.
  2. Climate change: Forests act as carbon sinks. When destroyed, they release stored carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, contributing to global warming and becoming carbon sources (like the aforementioned Amazon). Deforestation accounts for about 10% of anthropogenic carbon emissions.
  3. Soil erosion and degradation: Soil has a unique relationship with the trees they support. Tree roots bind with and anchor to soil—maintaining soil integrity and providing stability. Without this protection due to deforestation, soil erodes quickly, leading to soil degradation. 
  4. Disrupted water cycles: Forests play a crucial role in the water cycle through transpiration. A large tree can transpire up to 100 gallons (378 liters) of water per day.  Deforestation alters rainfall patterns, potentially leading to droughts in some areas and flooding in others. For example, deforestation has been associated with a 25% decrease in rainfall in Texas. Meanwhile, in the Brazilian Amazon, deforested areas experience 4-5 more dry months per year compared to forested areas.
  5. Impact on indigenous communities: Many indigenous communities rely on forests for their livelihoods, food, and cultural practices. Deforestation threatens their way of life. For example, indigenous people occupy 404 million hectares in Latin America, with 237 million hectares in the Amazon Basin. Deforestation activities, such as farming, logging, and mining, encroach on these lands, displacing communities and disrupting their traditional ways of life.
  6. Increased risk of disease: Forest fragmentation due to deforestation can lead to greater contact between wildlife and humans, potentially increasing the risk of zoonotic disease transmission. A study in Nature found that forest fragmentation in Africa increased human exposure to the Ebola virus by 15%. Also, research shows that about 31% of emerging infectious disease events are linked to land-use changes, including deforestation.
  7. Economic losses: As well as the impacts on the environment, people, and biodiversity, the bottom line is also affected by deforestation. Although not as widely discussed, deforestation and forest degradation result in global economic losses of around $4.5 trillion a year, according to the World Bank. 

Monitoring deforestation

Now that we’ve looked at why deforestation takes place and what the impacts are, let’s shift focus to what we can do about it. Monitoring deforestation is an important first step towards managing and mitigating it. 

Traditional monitoring methods

Traditional deforestation monitoring methods typically relied on a combination of ground-based surveys, aerial photography, and manual interpretation of imagery. These approaches offered detailed, localized insights into forest composition and health but are often time-consuming and resource-intensive.

 While still valuable, traditional methods often have limitations in scale and efficiency:

  • Ground surveys:
    • Involves field teams physically traversing forest areas to collect data
    • Provides detailed, localized information on forest composition and health
    • Limited in coverage and time-intensive
  • Aerial photography:
    • Uses aircraft to capture high-resolution images of forest areas
    • Offers better coverage than ground surveys but is still limited in scale
    • Requires significant resources for frequent monitoring
  • Manual interpretation:
    • Experts analyze images or field data to identify deforestation patterns
    • Highly accurate but often time-consuming and subjective

Modern monitoring methods

Modern deforestation monitoring has evolved in recent years, thanks to the latest geospatial technologies and data analysis techniques. We can now detect, quantify, and respond to forest cover changes across vast areas with incredible temporal resolution. 

  • Multispectral and hyperspectral satellites:

Satellite remote sensing utilizes multispectral and hyperspectral imagery from platforms like Landsat, Sentinel, and commercial satellites for large-scale, frequent monitoring. Remote sensing enables global-scale observations with diverse data sources available through platforms like UP42.

  • LiDAR and SAR technologies:

LiDAR provides 3D data on forest structure and canopy height, while SAR penetrates cloud cover for consistent monitoring in tropical regions. Both techniques are effective for detecting subtle changes in forest structure and can be deployed via satellite, aircraft, or drones.

  • Machine learning and AI-driven analysis:

Machine learning techniques automate the processing of large volumes of satellite imagery using algorithms like random forests and deep learning networks to detect deforestation patterns with high accuracy. For example, random forest algorithms have achieved up to 93% accuracy in identifying deforestation in the Amazon, and deep learning networks have demonstrated accuracy rates as high as 97% across diverse forest landscapes.

  • Time series analysis and big data analytics:

This approach utilizes historical satellite data to track forest changes over time, enabling the detection of gradual degradation and seasonal variations. Time series integrates multiple data sources and leverages cloud computing for comprehensive analysis. For example, using time series analysis, researchers have been able to detect deforestation trends with an accuracy of over 90%, providing critical insights into forest dynamics.

  • Near real-time monitoring systems:

These systems combine frequent satellite observations with rapid data processing to enable quick detection and response to deforestation events. Examples include Global Forest Watch and FORMA. Global Forest Watch can detect forest disturbances as small as 30×30 meters within days of occurrence, covering over 80% of the world’s tropical forests. The FORMA (Forest Monitoring for Action) system processes daily MODIS satellite imagery to provide alerts of likely forest-clearing activities within 48 hours, achieving up to 90% accuracy in some tropical regions.

  •  Drones and participatory GIS:

Drones offer high-resolution imagery for targeted areas, while Participatory GIS (PGIS) combines GIS with local knowledge and community engagement in data collection. Studies show that drone-based monitoring can detect small-scale deforestation with up to 96% accuracy, while PGIS approaches have improved mapping accuracy by 15-20% in some regions by incorporating local expertise. These methods fill the gap between satellite and ground-based observations and integrate local knowledge with remote sensing data. 

We’ll explore the concept of PGIS and how it empowers local communities, further on in this article. 

First, let’s move on from monitoring deforestation and look at how deforestation can be reversed.

What does reversing deforestation mean?

While deforestation is an enormous issue that needs limiting through things like economic incentives for conservation, the establishment of protected areas, and supply chain transparency – unfortunately a no-deforestation world isn’t quite here yet. One of the most effective methods to tackle deforestation is to reverse it.

Reversing deforestation involves a comprehensive set of actions aimed at restoring forest ecosystems that have been degraded or completely cleared. 

For those of us in the geospatial, space, and GIS fields, this process is not just about planting trees but encompasses a multi-faceted approach that brings in both advanced technologies and spatial data to achieve sustainable outcomes.

Leveraging drone data: Effective deforestation monitoring and restoration

Traditional methods of monitoring deforestation are an excellent way to have boots on the ground. However, they can be time-consuming, limited in coverage, and expensive. 

Satellites and drones bring an often more efficient and cost-effective method of monitoring deforestation over large areas. 

Drones provide high-resolution, frequently updated imagery that complements traditional satellite-based remote sensing. Daniel Zuleta, postdoctoral researcher with the Forest Global Earth Observatory (ForestGEO), has said a single drone can cover an area in a few days that would take a team a year on foot. Drone-based monitoring can cover areas up to 400 hectares per day, enabling rapid assessment of large forest regions.

They offer unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution, enabling the detection of small-scale forest disturbances and the creation of detailed 3D forest structure models using photogrammetry and LiDAR.  High-resolution drone imagery can detect individual trees, with some studies achieving 85-95% accuracy in tree species identification.

Reversing deforestation requires concrete actions beyond commitments by companies across the globe. Drone technology can be used to not only detect deforestation but also verify images taken by local communities on the ground, ensuring no deforestation has happened. 

Empowering communities: Drone data for local forest conservation

As mentioned earlier, Participatory GIS (PGIS) plays a crucial role in empowering local communities to monitor and reverse deforestation using drone data. 

This approach combines modern geospatial technologies with local knowledge and community engagement, creating a powerful tool for forest conservation. 

Here’s a look at how PGIS empowers communities in this context using drone data:

  • Community-led data collection and analysis

Participatory GIS enables local communities to actively engage in collecting and analyzing drone data. For example, in Peru’s Loreto region, nearly 80 native communities used drones and smartphones to monitor their territories, resulting in a 52% reduction in deforestation in the first year of implementation. This hands-on involvement fosters a sense of ownership and responsibility for forest monitoring.

  • Real-time monitoring and rapid response

Drones enable frequent and detailed surveys of forest areas, allowing communities to detect and respond to deforestation activities quickly. In the Gran Chaco region of Paraguay, drone data collected by GLOBHE and analyzed by GainForest’s AI algorithms provides near real-time updates on forest status, enabling quick responses to threats. As a result, the use of drone data and smart AI tools is helping to reverse deforestation and empower local communities in Paraguay. 

  • Integration of local knowledge with high-tech solutions

PGIS allows communities to combine their traditional ecological knowledge with drone imagery and GIS analysis. This integration creates more comprehensive and contextually rich maps that reflect both the physical landscape and the cultural significance of different forest areas, leading to more effective conservation strategies.

  • Evidence-based advocacy and decision-making

The high-resolution imagery and maps produced through drone-assisted PGIS provide communities with powerful visual evidence of forest changes. This data can be used in negotiations with authorities, in legal proceedings to protect forest rights, and to inform local decision-making processes. For instance, the NFTrees initiative in Paraguay uses drone data to create transparent, constantly updated proof-of-impact certificates for conservation efforts.

  • Empowerment through technology transfer and collaboration

By learning to use drones and GIS tools, community members gain valuable technical skills. This knowledge transfer can lead to increased employment opportunities and a greater voice in forest management decisions. The collaboration between local communities, technology providers like GLOBHE, and organizations like GainForest illustrates how this empowerment can lead to more effective forest protection strategies.

Collaboration for community: UP42 & GLOBHE

In 2023, UP42 and GLOBHE teamed up to use drone data for monitoring and reversing deforestation while empowering local communities.

Here’s how it works: GLOBHE connects local drone operators with organizations that need high-quality images of hard-to-reach areas all over the world. Then, UP42’s geospatial platform provides access to this data, while enabling its processing and analysis alongside other Earth observation data sources—to get a really clear picture of what’s happening on the ground.

By bringing together local knowledge with high-tech drone data and analysis, partnerships such as these create a much more detailed and contextually rich understanding of how forests are changing.

This approach not only enhances monitoring capabilities but also provides powerful evidence for advocacy and decision-making in forest conservation efforts.

Looking ahead, combining drone technology with local community engagement through PGIS methods could really shake up how we approach forest conservation. As drone data becomes easier to use and more accessible, it has the potential to transform how local communities monitor, protect, and restore their forests. 

It’s important to note though, that drone data as a tool should complement, and not replace, valuable fieldwork done on the ground.

What do you think about all this? How might things change if the people most affected by deforestation had the tools to monitor and protect their own lands? We’d love to hear your thoughts!

Say thanks for this article (2)
The community is supported by:
Become a sponsor
#Categories
#0.30m #Airbus #Construction #Drones #Environment #Featured #Maxar #Optical #Science
Bridging the Gap: How Buying Satellite and Drone Data is Evolving
Aleks Buczkowski 02.1.2024
AWESOME 5
#Agriculture #Construction #Energy #Environment #Environmental Protection #Financial Services #GeoDev #Government #Humanitarian #Ideas #Natural Resources #Orthorectification #Satellites #Transportation
Why Orthorectification is Key for Real-World Terrain Mapping and How To Use It
Nikita Marwaha Kraetzig 10.14.2024
AWESOME 1
#< 0.10m #10m #1m #Agriculture #Construction #Drones #Environment #Environmental Protection #Featured #Multispectral #Optical #SAR #Science
Are Drones and Satellites Competing or Complementary as Sources of Geospatial Data?
Aleks Buczkowski 01.19.2024
AWESOME 8
Next article
Current Trends in Geospatial and Remote Sensing Research: A Review of Recent Scientific Literature
#News #Science

Current Trends in Geospatial and Remote Sensing Research: A Review of Recent Scientific Literature

Editor’s note: This article was written as part of EO Hub – a journalistic collaboration between UP42 and Geoawesome. Created for policymakers, decision-makers, geospatial experts and enthusiasts alike, EO Hub is a key resource for anyone trying to understand how Earth observation is transforming our world. Read more about EO Hub here


The EO Hub section of our site is dedicated to highlighting the key trends and use cases within the EO and geospatial sector. But, what if we looked beyond industry and shifted our focus to science? What are researchers coming together to investigate? What areas of interest are being funded, researched, and published across the world?

To find out we analyzed 6000 research articles published on the Springer Nature website from January 2023 to June 2024—revealing some intriguing insights.

We used Springer’s API and targeted keywords like “geospatial” and “remote sensing“. By doing so, we discovered key research topics, current trends, and themes, and took note of the countries with the most published articles on specific topics.

So, what topics are researchers looking at? That’s where keywords come in.

Reviewing Research: Why are Keyword Trends So Telling?

Keywords are an excellent marker to describe trends in research areas. They tell us a lot about how the field is developing, inform business decisions, and detect changes in research priorities.

Our review aimed to find the most popular keywords and technologies featured in research paper titles and abstracts. We then visualized the locations of these papers per country on a world map.

At the forefront of this is Springer Nature, one of the leading international scientific publishers. Springer publishes over 200 articles each month focused on remote sensing and geospatial. From satellite imagery techniques to GIS applications and advanced data analysis methods, Springer is a useful resource for researchers, industry professionals, and curious minds alike.

Reviewing Research: Why are Keyword Trends So Telling? Keywords are an excellent marker to describe trends in research areas. They tell us a lot about how the field is developing, inform business decisions, and detect changes in research priorities. Our review aimed to find the most popular keywords and technologies featured in research paper titles and abstracts. We then visualized the locations of these papers per country on a world map. At the forefront of this is Springer Nature, one of the leading international scientific publishers. Springer publishes over 200 articles each month focused on remote sensing and geospatial. From satellite imagery techniques to GIS applications and advanced data analysis methods, Springer is a useful resource for researchers, industry professionals, and curious minds alike.

Keywords Shaping the Industry: A Snapshot of Geospatial and Remote Sensing Trends

Top Single Keywords:

The most popular keywords we found were:

  • “Predict” and “Prediction”

In recent scientific papers, keywords like “predict” and “prediction” frequently appear in titles and abstracts, highlighting the growing importance of this topic in environmental research. Thanks to tools in remote sensing, earth observation, and geospatial technology, scientists can now accurately predict climate change, weather patterns, natural disasters, and land deformations. This tells us that researchers are heavily focused on future-proofing our world and preparing us for what is yet to come. From the collection of 6000 articles analyzed from the selected timeframe, 1230 were found to include these keywords.

  • “Groundwater” and “Water”

Keywords like “groundwater” and “water” are essential in studying the effects of groundwater pumping in mining areas and changes in water levels due to droughts or floods. For example, in African countries, where water scarcity is a significant concern, sustainable water management is essential to maintain groundwater resources and support communities. Understanding these factors is key to inventing effective strategies for water use and conservation. In our review, a total of 2004 articles featured the specified keywords.

  • “Urban” and “Urbanization”

Why do keywords like “urban” and “urbanization” frequently appear in research papers focused on geospatial and remote sensing? This is because of the growing interest in monitoring and managing city growth and its impacts. These terms often relate to the need for detailed analysis of urban areas (e.g. air quality or urban heat islands). Out of 6000 articles from the studied period, 1349 contained these keywords.

  • “Landslide”, “Erosion, “Soil”, Displacement”, “Movement”

Scientists frequently use keywords like “landslide”, “erosion”, “soil”, “displacement”, and “movement” to study the dynamics of the Earth’s surface and the factors contributing to land instability. These terms are essential for understanding natural hazards, soil degradation, and ground displacement, and critical for risk assessment or disaster management. 328 of the articles mentioned the keyword “landslide”, 361 talked about “erosion”, 1051 included the word “soil”, 63 used “displacement”, and 154 discussed “movement”. In total – almost 2000 mentions!

  • “Model” and “Modeling”

In the context of geospatial and remote sensing research, the keywords “model” and “modeling” are often used to describe the process of creating simulations and predictive tools that analyze spatial data and environmental changes. These terms are crucial for developing and testing hypotheses, and forecasting future conditions. An impressive number of 2931 mentions were detected in our research.

The top single keywords that occurred in the review of scientific literature

The top single keywords that occurred in the review of scientific literature

Top Keyword Phrases:

Now that we’ve taken a look at the single keywords currently trending, we wanted to cross-check this with keyword phrases that are shaping the research landscape. While individual keywords offer valuable insights into research trends, examining keyword phrases provides a more nuanced understanding of the current research landscape.

Our review points towards several dominant themes:

  • “Land Cover” and “Land Use”

The phrases “Land cover” and “Land use” appear as primary focus areas, underscoring the role of EO in mapping the Earth’s surface. Many articles address the topic of land use and land cover classification using EO, which supports development and enhances the accuracy of following GIS analyses. As many as 1925 articles contained these keyphrases.

  • “Remote Sensing”

We found that “Remote sensing” remains a cornerstone phrase, reflecting the continuous evolution of sensor technologies. These advancements enable more accurate and detailed data collection, revolutionizing our ability to monitor and analyze Earth’s systems. If we look at the occurrence of this phrase over the years, there has been over a fivefold increase in frequency of use between 2006 and 2023. “Remote sensing” keyphrase occurred 1203 contained in revised articles.

Remote Sensing Research: A Review of Recent Scientific Literature

  • “Climate Change”

The phrase “Climate change” dominates research papers due to its general impact on ecosystems and the need to address its effects. This popularity results from its influence on everything from weather patterns to human health, becoming an interdisciplinary study. This time 763 articles contained this keyphrase.

  • “Machine Learning” and “Neural Network”

The increasing frequency of phrases like “Machine learning” and “Neural network” highlights a growing trend toward AI-driven data analysis in recent years. Computational techniques, boosted by platforms such as UP42, improve the industry’s ability to handle and interpret BIG data. Among the 6,000 articles reviewed from the period in question, 745 contained the mentioned keyphrases.

  • “Water Resources”, “Groundwater Resources” and “Water Quality”

We noticed that keyword phrases such as “Water resources”, “Groundwater resources”, and “Water quality” have remained a high priority in recent years. Water resource management appears to be a significant topic from the perspective of scientists and the volume of research conducted on this subject. Of the 6000 articles examined from the specified period, 618 included these keyphrases.

The top keyword phrases that occurred in the review of scientific literature

The top keyword phrases that occurred in the review of scientific literature

Visualizing the Global Footprint of Geospatial Exploration

Now that we’ve explored the kinds of keywords being used in scientific literature, we wanted to know, where are the most scientific articles being produced?

We tried to answer this question by creating choropleth maps on the number of articles published by each country.

To craft these visuals, we were inspired by the Geoawesome article “How to Create Choropleth Map in Excel in Just 3 Minutes”.

Let us know if you’ve created similar maps from your own analysis, we’d love to see them!

We created choropleth maps on the number of articles published by each country!

We created choropleth maps on the number of articles published by each country!

Regional Trends: What Do the Choropleth Maps Tell Us?

Research priorities in remote sensing and geospatial sciences demonstrate regional variations, reflecting each continent’s unique challenges, resources, and development trajectories.

For example, European and American countries invest heavily in research related to remote sensing using satellite imagery, artificial intelligence solutions, and climate change.

This continental diversity in research focus not only reflects regional priorities but also highlights the versatility and critical importance of remote sensing and geospatial sciences in addressing a wide array of global challenges.

Analyzing Technological Trends

Next, we looked a little further and reviewed the occurrence of keywords related to technologies. From our analysis, it’s clear that remote sensing technology consists of various intermediate techniques, all unified by the common goal of observing and understanding our planet.

AI-based technologies, including machine learning and deep learning, are supporting various industries by improving data processing and interpretation. Remote sensing, integrated with AI, helps in interpreting geospatial data and expanding possibilities across diverse applications.

Geospatial Intelligence: Shaping a Sustainable Future

What did we find? Researchers are spending their time and energy looking into a clear cluster of topics in our ever-changing world.

Our analysis of 6,000 articles from Springer Nature shows that the geospatial and earth observation industry is focused on finding solutions for climate change, rapid urban development, and damaging land changes. It’s safe to say that from our research, researchers believe EO and AI hold the potential to address these major global challenges.

Now, more than ever, the focus is on the relationships between human activities, natural systems, and climate patterns. Our research underscores the geospatial and remote sensing industries’ role in creating a sustainable future, offering smart solutions to pressing global issues.

Are you researching some of the areas mentioned above? Get in touch to share your findings!

Read on
Search